Abortion The abortion debate most commonly relates to the "induced abortion" of an embryo or fetus at some point in a pregnancy, which is also how the term is used in a legal sense. In medical parlance, "abortion" can refer to either miscarriage or abortion until the fetus is viable. After viability, doctors call an abortion a "termination of pregnancy".
Refuting Eastern Orthodoxy This article contains content used from author: And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: Peter was the Bishop of Rome, and his followers i. This process continued through the ages, with the pope being able to change the process of election such as by instituting a college of cardinals if he so decided, since the pope has supreme authority in the Church from Christ Mt.
All individuals not elected in this fashion e. This logical framework holds true for all of history, and has allowed one to see which are the true popes and which are not — even if at some of the most difficult periods of Church history, such as the Great Western Schism, ascertaining the facts to correctly apply these principles was difficult enough that some mistakes were made by certain individuals.
I have thus described the consistent, logical framework of the succession of the authority given to St. Peter by Jesus Christ to the popes down through the ages. This shows that the Catholic Faith is consistent.
The authority given to St. Peter and his successors is the backing of the dogmatic councils; this is the authority which anathematizes those who deny the dogmatic councils' teaching. Ephesus II the heretical monophysite council in had almost exactly the same number of bishops as Constantinople I bishops.
But if we apply the principles of Eastern "Orthodoxy," the two councils are on the same level, both being backed by the authority of equal bishops.
Unless there is a supreme bishop to make one council binding, it's a farce to say that one council is definitely dogmatic while the other with the same number of bishops is definitely heretical!
Equal results in a draw…. Doesn't it strike as a bit ridiculous that many other councils were held afterwhich the Eastern "Orthodox" arbitrarily reject as "not accepted by the Church," even though these councils which they reject had more bishops than those which they accept?
What about the Council of Florencewhich saw reunion of the East with the Catholic Church when Patriarch Joseph of Constantinople accepted Florence, the primacy of the Bishop of Rome, and Florence's teaching against all who would deny it?
How on Earth could one logically say that Florence was not accepted "by the Church," while other councils were? What are the criteria?
I've asked many Eastern "Orthodox" this very question and received no answer simply because they have none. Whatever criteria they pick to use as the justification for accepting a particular council as dogmatic, and rejecting another council as non-dogmatic, can be used against them to prove that, on that very basis, they would have to accept later Roman Catholic councils.
Yes, Eastern Orthodoxy cannot logically hold any council to be dogmatic and binding, as one will see if one honestly and deeply think about it. In Eastern Orthodoxy there is nothing which backs the anathemas of Ephesus or another council other than the word of bishops, who are equal to other bishops who many times taught the opposite.
If the "Church" spoke at Constantinople I because bishops came to it and pronounced authoritatively on faith, then the "Church" spoke at many other false councils in the early Church which had similar numbers of bishops! It is inescapable, therefore, that according to the Eastern "Orthodox" position the Church of Christ has defected i.
This contradicts the promises of Christ that the gates of Hell cannot prevail and that God would be with His Church always Mt. Eastern "Orthodoxy" is an illogical farce, which rejects the clear teaching of Scripture and the fathers on the Papal Primacy, and which causes those who accept it to truly wind up believing in no dogma at all.
Because of the fact that Eastern Orthodoxy does not — and cannot — really believe in any dogmatic councils as shown above is why it's so appealing to so many: That thou are Peter: And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven.
And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven:Writing a persuasive essay requires the writer’s ability to convince the audience and make it accept the arguments of the essay as well as the conclusions.
Orthodoxy signifies right belief or purity of faith. How "Orthodox" became the proper name of the Eastern Church it is difficult to say. It was used at first, long before the schism of Photius, especially in the East, not with any idea of opposition against the West, but rather as the antithesis to the Eastern heretics — Nestorians and Monophysites.
The Bible is a lot of things to a lot of people, but to Christians, especially, it is a source of inspiration and a guide to daily living.. To others, the Bible is a historical document and a source of controversy. To others still, the Bible is a self-contradictory mish-mash of arcane rules and proscriptions, mostly relevant to long-dead cultures in far away places.
Argumentative Essay Topics From Team At Essay Basics Click To See Examples Of Argumentative Writing. When it comes to essay writing professors usually supply students with topics to write lausannecongress2018.comr, there are cases when . Automatic works cited and bibliography formatting for MLA, APA and Chicago/Turabian citation styles.
Now supports 7th edition of MLA. [ 3 ] The family is the unit of the modern State. Woman is the heart and crown of the modern family.
In Mormonism womanhood has been outraged and crucified from Emma Smith to the last polygamous victim and martyr.